Claims 1–5: novelty and inventive step
Basis D1 and D2 from the Search Report
Novelty assessment each claim against D1 and D2
| Claim | Status | Citation | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Not new | D1 | D1 shows the base, both swing arms, the gear train and the flat support plates. |
| 2 | Not new | D1 | D1’s swing arms turn on arc-shaped rails in the base. |
| 3 | Not new | D1 | D1 holds the arms in intermediate positions with a cam and a spring. |
| 4 | New | D1, D2 | D1 folds the display into a U shape. D2 has no gear train. |
| 5 | New | D1, D2 | Neither document delays the tilt of the support plates. |
Summary. Claims 1–3 lack novelty over D1. Claims 4 and 5 are new.
Inventive step assessment problem-solution approach
- Closest prior art
- D1. It shares the most features with claim 1.
- Distinguishing features
-
- Claim 4The support plates tilt to leave a teardrop-shaped space when folded.
- Claim 5A pin in a curved slot holds back the tilt until the arms reach 60°.
- Objective technical problem
- How to fold the display without creasing it at the bend.
| Claim | Status | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Obvious | D2 tilts its support plates into a teardrop space to stop the screen creasing. Adding this to D1 is obvious. |
| 5 | Open | No document suggests delaying the tilt. Left for your assessment. |
“When the device is folded, the two support plates tilt toward each other, so that the bent portion of the screen forms a teardrop shape and no crease is formed.”
- Industrial applicability
- Claims 1–5 can be made and used in industry.
- Clarity
- Claim 3: “intermediate position” is not defined. Consider an angle range.